The printed outcomes of sailors’ aggressive examinations for promotion inside the naval service mirror a fruits of devoted preparation, rigorous analysis, and profession milestones. These outcomes decide who advances to the following paygrade and assumes larger tasks inside their respective rankings. A hypothetical instance could be a Sailor reaching a excessive rating, leading to promotion to Petty Officer First Class.
Periodic evaluations are important for sustaining a extremely expert and motivated naval pressure. The outcomes of those evaluations not solely form particular person careers but additionally impression fleet readiness and operational effectiveness. Traditionally, the Navy has employed varied strategies for assessing and selling its personnel, regularly evolving to mirror the altering wants of a contemporary maritime pressure. This merit-based system fosters a aggressive surroundings that encourages skilled improvement and acknowledges distinctive efficiency, in the end contributing to a stronger, extra succesful Navy.
This text will additional discover varied facets of the promotion system, together with eligibility necessities, the examination course of, and the impression of those outcomes on profession development. Further subjects will embrace assets accessible to assist sailors searching for development, and an outline of latest modifications or updates to the system.
1. Eligibility Necessities
Eligibility necessities kind the inspiration upon which development inside the U.S. Navy is constructed. These stipulations decide which sailors can compete for development to the following paygrade. Assembly these standards doesn’t assure promotion, however failing to satisfy them precludes a sailor from consideration. This cause-and-effect relationship instantly hyperlinks eligibility to development outcomes. For instance, a sailor should meet minimal time-in-rate necessities earlier than taking the development examination. With out the required time served, even an ideal rating on the examination is not going to end in development. Different eligibility elements embrace completion of required coaching, efficiency marks, and disciplinary document.
Particular eligibility necessities differ by score and paygrade. Some rankings might require specialised coaching or {qualifications} previous to development. Understanding these particular necessities is essential for sailors planning their profession development. Assets such because the Navy Development Guide and command profession counselors present detailed data relating to eligibility for every score. Sensible utility of this understanding permits sailors to focus their efforts on assembly the mandatory stipulations, maximizing their possibilities of development when eligible. As an example, a sailor conscious of upcoming time-in-rate necessities can plan their profession timeline accordingly, avoiding potential delays in development alternative.
In abstract, eligibility necessities function a gatekeeper for development. Cautious consideration to those necessities is essential for any sailor searching for profession development inside the Navy. Understanding and fulfilling these stipulations is step one in the direction of a profitable naval profession. Failure to satisfy even one requirement can considerably impression development outcomes, highlighting the significance of proactive profession planning and adherence to established pointers. This understanding empowers sailors to navigate the complexities of the development system successfully.
2. Examination Scores
Examination scores play a pivotal position in figuring out development outcomes inside the U.S. Navy. These scores, derived from standardized checks particular to every score and paygrade, assess a sailor’s information of their skilled duties, army necessities, and management ideas. A robust correlation exists between excessive examination scores and favorable development outcomes. A better rating signifies larger subject material experience, enhancing a sailor’s competitiveness inside the development cycle. For instance, two sailors with an identical efficiency evaluations however totally different examination scores will doubtless expertise totally different development outcomes; the sailor with the upper rating has a larger likelihood of promotion.
The significance of examination scores stems from their vital weighting inside the remaining a number of rating (FMS). The FMS is a composite rating used to rank eligible sailors competing for development. Examination scores usually comprise a considerable portion of the FMS, instantly influencing a sailor’s rating and due to this fact their chance of promotion. This direct impression underscores the sensible significance of devoted examination preparation. Take into account a situation the place a number of sailors possess comparable efficiency evaluations and time in price. In such instances, the examination rating can develop into the deciding think about figuring out who advances. Investing effort and time in learning related supplies and working towards test-taking methods can yield substantial returns within the type of improved examination scores, and consequently, enhanced development prospects.
In abstract, examination scores are a essential determinant of development inside the Navy. Their weighted contribution to the FMS instantly influences a sailor’s competitiveness and likelihood of promotion. Recognizing this important connection emphasizes the sensible worth of targeted research and diligent preparation for development examinations. This understanding permits sailors to strategy examinations strategically, maximizing their potential for achievement within the aggressive development surroundings.
3. Efficiency Evaluations
Efficiency evaluations represent a essential element of Navy development outcomes. These evaluations present a formalized evaluation of a sailor’s skilled efficiency, army bearing, and management potential. A direct causal relationship exists between analysis outcomes and development alternative. Sturdy efficiency evaluations contribute considerably to a sailor’s competitiveness inside the development system. For instance, a sailor constantly receiving high marks in areas like job proficiency, management, and initiative demonstrates a excessive degree of efficiency, growing their possibilities of promotion. Conversely, constantly subpar evaluations can hinder development prospects, even when examination scores are excessive. This underscores the significance of sustained superior efficiency all through a sailor’s profession.
Evaluations contribute to development outcomes by means of their impression on the ultimate a number of rating (FMS). Much like examination scores, efficiency marks issue closely within the FMS calculation. Analysis outcomes translate into efficiency mark common (PMA) factors, which instantly affect a sailor’s rating amongst friends. The sensible significance of this weighting is evident: constant excessive efficiency, mirrored in sturdy evaluations, results in the next PMA and thus improves a sailor’s standing inside the aggressive development course of. As an example, two sailors with an identical examination scores however differing PMAs will doubtless see divergent development outcomes; the sailor with the upper PMA positive factors a aggressive edge. This illustrates the sensible worth of constantly striving for excellence in all facets of naval service.
In abstract, efficiency evaluations symbolize a cornerstone of the Navy development system. Their substantial contribution to the FMS calculation instantly influences a sailor’s competitiveness and prospects for promotion. Sustained superior efficiency, documented by means of constantly sturdy evaluations, proves important for profession development. Understanding this connection allows sailors to prioritize constant efficiency excellence as a key technique for reaching their development targets. This consciousness empowers sailors to strategy their duties with the understanding that day by day actions instantly affect future profession alternatives inside the Navy.
4. Time in Price (TIR)
Time in Price (TIR) stands as a basic issue influencing development inside the U.S. Navy. It represents the length a sailor has served at their present paygrade. TIR necessities function a baseline qualification for development, guaranteeing sailors possess sufficient expertise earlier than assuming elevated tasks. Understanding the impression of TIR is essential for efficient profession planning and navigating the complexities of naval development.
-
Minimal TIR Necessities:
Every paygrade inside the Navy carries a minimal TIR requirement that have to be met earlier than a sailor is eligible to compete for development. These necessities differ relying on the particular score and paygrade. As an example, development to Petty Officer Second Class may require a minimal of 12 months TIR as a Petty Officer Third Class, whereas development to Petty Officer First Class may necessitate 36 months TIR as a Petty Officer Second Class. Failing to satisfy these minimal necessities disqualifies a sailor from development consideration, no matter efficiency or examination scores. This underscores the significance of monitoring TIR and guaranteeing ample time served at every paygrade.
-
TIR as a Aggressive Issue:
Past minimal eligibility, TIR can affect development competitiveness. Whereas not as closely weighted as efficiency evaluations or examination scores, TIR contributes to the ultimate a number of rating (FMS). In instances the place a number of sailors possess comparable efficiency metrics and examination scores, TIR can function a tie-breaker. A sailor with extra TIR may acquire a slight benefit, demonstrating an extended interval of sustained efficiency at their present degree. This nuance highlights the potential advantages of exceeding minimal TIR necessities.
-
TIR and Development Alternative:
TIR interacts with development alternative quotas. Restricted development quotas inside sure rankings can lead to extremely aggressive development cycles. In such eventualities, even assembly minimal TIR necessities doesn’t assure promotion. Sailors with longer TIR might need a aggressive edge, however in the end, development hinges on the general FMS and the variety of accessible quotas. This interaction between TIR and quotas emphasizes the significance of constantly excessive efficiency and robust examination scores.
-
TIR and Profession Planning:
Understanding TIR necessities is essential for efficient profession planning. Sailors searching for to advance ought to rigorously observe their TIR and plan accordingly. This proactive strategy allows sailors to anticipate eligibility home windows and align their skilled improvement efforts with development timelines. For instance, a sailor conscious of upcoming TIR necessities can prioritize finishing required coaching or specializing in enhancing efficiency in particular areas to maximise their competitiveness when eligible for development. This forward-thinking strategy optimizes probabilities for profession development.
In abstract, TIR is an integral element of the Navy development system. It capabilities as each a baseline qualification and a contributing issue to total competitiveness. By understanding the nuances of TIR necessities and their impression on development outcomes, sailors can successfully plan their careers and maximize their potential for promotion inside the naval service. This complete understanding empowers sailors to navigate the development system strategically, guaranteeing they’re well-positioned for profession success.
5. Awards and Decorations
Awards and decorations inside the U.S. Navy signify recognition for excellent efficiency, vital achievements, and contributions to the naval service. Whereas not a major determinant of development, these accolades play a noteworthy position within the total analysis of a sailor’s profession development and contribute to their aggressive edge in development cycles. Understanding the connection between awards and decorations and development outcomes is crucial for profession planning and maximizing development potential.
-
Contribution to Remaining A number of Rating (FMS):
Awards and decorations contribute factors towards a sailor’s FMS. Whereas the weighting of those factors is much less vital than that of efficiency evaluations or examination scores, they’ll nonetheless present a beneficial benefit in aggressive development eventualities. Accumulating awards and decorations demonstrates a sustained sample of superior efficiency and dedication, enhancing a sailor’s total profile. As an example, two sailors with comparable efficiency marks and examination scores is perhaps differentiated by their awards and decorations, with the extra adorned sailor doubtlessly receiving an edge within the FMS calculation. This underscores the significance of striving for excellence that warrants recognition.
-
Reflection of Professionalism and Dedication:
Awards and decorations symbolize tangible proof of a sailor’s dedication, professionalism, and dedication to the Navy’s core values. Incomes such recognition signifies constant excessive efficiency, initiative, and management potential, qualities extremely valued inside the development system. For instance, receiving a Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal for excellent efficiency in a particular obligation task alerts a sailor’s dedication to excellence, which may positively affect perceptions throughout development choice boards. This highlights the significance of constantly exceeding expectations in all assigned duties.
-
Impression on Choice Boards:
Whereas the FMS performs a key position in preliminary development rankings, choice boards usually take into account the totality of a sailor’s document when making remaining development choices. Awards and decorations present concrete examples of achievements and contributions, providing a richer context for evaluating a sailor’s total efficiency. A sturdy document of awards can reinforce sturdy efficiency evaluations and examination scores, strengthening a sailor’s candidacy for development. For instance, a sailor with a number of Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medals is perhaps seen extra favorably by a variety board than a sailor with an equal FMS however fewer decorations, because the medals present tangible proof of sustained superior efficiency. This underscores the significance of searching for alternatives to excel and contribute to the mission.
-
Motivation and Morale:
Past their impression on development, awards and decorations function highly effective motivators for particular person sailors and contribute to total unit morale. Publicly recognizing achievement reinforces optimistic behaviors and encourages continued excellence. This optimistic reinforcement fosters a tradition of excessive efficiency, not directly contributing to improved development outcomes throughout the command. As an example, a sailor acknowledged with a Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal for superior efficiency may encourage their friends to try for comparable ranges of accomplishment, in the end elevating the general efficiency requirements inside the unit. This highlights the broader impression of awards and decorations on the naval group.
In abstract, whereas not a direct determinant in the identical method as examination scores and efficiency evaluations, awards and decorations kind a beneficial element of a sailor’s total development profile. They contribute to the FMS, mirror dedication and professionalism, affect choice boards, and contribute to a optimistic command local weather. A complete understanding of their position allows sailors to understand their worth past particular person recognition and leverage them as a part of a broader technique for profession development inside the U.S. Navy.
6. Development Quotas
Development quotas instantly affect Navy development outcomes, representing the finite variety of accessible development alternatives inside every score and paygrade. Quotas are decided by personnel necessities, budgetary constraints, and the general construction of the Navy. This creates a cause-and-effect relationship the place the variety of accessible quotas instantly limits the variety of sailors who can advance, no matter particular person efficiency. For instance, if 100 sailors are eligible for development to Petty Officer First Class inside a particular score, however the quota is barely 20, then solely 20 sailors will advance, even when greater than 20 meet the minimal eligibility necessities and carry out properly on the examination. This underscores the aggressive nature of naval development.
Development quotas operate as a essential management mechanism inside the development system. They regulate the movement of personnel by means of the ranks, guaranteeing applicable manning ranges at every paygrade. The quotas additionally inject a major component of competitors into the development course of. Even sailors who obtain excessive scores on examinations and obtain wonderful efficiency evaluations might not advance if the quota for his or her score and paygrade is especially restrictive. Understanding quota limitations offers a practical context for deciphering development outcomes. As an example, a sailor who narrowly missed development in a extremely aggressive score with a small quota may discover this much less discouraging than a sailor who missed development in a score with a big quota. This sensible understanding emphasizes the significance of constantly striving for peak efficiency to maximise development potential.
In abstract, development quotas kind an integral element of Navy development outcomes. They set up the higher restrict of development alternatives, making a aggressive surroundings the place efficiency and eligibility are important however not all the time ample for development. Recognizing the position and impression of quotas permits sailors to develop knowledgeable expectations and handle profession development strategically inside the framework of Navy personnel necessities. This understanding reinforces the significance of constant excessive efficiency, diligent examination preparation, and proactive profession planning in navigating the complexities of the Navy development system.
7. Remaining A number of Rating (FMS)
The Remaining A number of Rating (FMS) capabilities because the cornerstone of U.S. Navy development outcomes, instantly figuring out which sailors advance to the following paygrade. This rating represents a composite evaluation of a sailor’s {qualifications}, encompassing efficiency evaluations, examination scores, awards, time in price, and different elements. A direct, causal relationship exists between FMS and development outcomes. A better FMS will increase the chance of development, whereas a decrease FMS decreases it. The FMS rating of eligible candidates inside a particular score and paygrade determines who receives development alternatives inside quota limitations. For instance, if two sailors are competing for one development slot, the sailor with the upper FMS will obtain the promotion. This highlights the essential significance of maximizing every element contributing to the FMS.
The sensible significance of understanding the FMS lies in its predictive energy. By understanding the weighted elements inside the FMS calculation, sailors can focus their efforts on areas yielding the best return by way of rating enchancment. For instance, if examination scores carry a heavier weight than awards factors, a sailor may prioritize research time over pursuing extra awards. This strategic strategy permits for optimized effort towards maximizing development potential. Moreover, consciousness of FMS calculations helps sailors perceive development outcomes inside their particular score and paygrade. A extremely aggressive score with restricted quotas may require a considerably larger FMS for development in comparison with a much less aggressive score. This comparative evaluation allows life like expectations and knowledgeable profession planning.
In abstract, the FMS is just not merely a numerical worth however a pivotal determinant of profession development inside the Navy. Its composite nature displays a holistic evaluation of a sailor’s {qualifications}. A radical understanding of the FMS calculation and its elements empowers sailors to make knowledgeable choices relating to profession improvement and development preparation. This understanding interprets to sensible utility by means of strategic prioritization of efforts, leading to maximized development potential inside the aggressive panorama of naval service.
8. Promotion Suggestions
Promotion suggestions symbolize a essential juncture inside the U.S. Navy development system, instantly influencing profession trajectory and shaping total development outcomes. These suggestions, originating from commanding officers and different licensed superiors, present a qualitative evaluation of a sailor’s readiness for elevated duty and management. Serving as a vital element of the development course of, promotion suggestions provide beneficial perception right into a sailor’s potential and contribute considerably to the ultimate willpower of development outcomes.
-
Commanding Officer’s Enter:
The commanding officer’s promotion advice carries substantial weight. This evaluation displays the commanding officer’s direct statement of a sailor’s efficiency, management qualities, and total suitability for development. Suggestions vary from “Should Promote” (extremely advisable) to “Promote” (advisable) to “Progressing” (potential for future promotion) to “Not Beneficial” (not appropriate for development presently). A “Should Promote” advice signifies distinctive efficiency and potential, considerably strengthening a sailor’s development prospects. Conversely, a “Not Beneficial” designation can severely hinder development alternatives. This underscores the significance of constantly demonstrating sturdy efficiency and management potential to earn a positive advice.
-
Analysis Correlation:
Promotion suggestions ideally align with efficiency evaluations. Consistency between evaluations and suggestions strengthens the general credibility of a sailor’s development profile. A sailor with constantly excessive efficiency marks coupled with a “Should Promote” advice presents a compelling case for development. Conversely, discrepancies between evaluations and suggestions, reminiscent of excessive efficiency marks coupled with a decrease promotion advice, can increase questions and doubtlessly impression development outcomes. This highlights the significance of open communication with superiors and addressing any efficiency gaps to make sure alignment between evaluations and suggestions.
-
Impression on Choice Boards:
Promotion suggestions present beneficial context for choice boards reviewing development candidates. Whereas the Remaining A number of Rating (FMS) provides a quantitative evaluation, promotion suggestions provide qualitative insights right into a sailor’s potential, work ethic, and management capabilities. Choice boards rigorously take into account these suggestions, particularly in instances the place candidates possess comparable FMS scores. A robust advice can distinguish a sailor from friends and positively affect the board’s remaining resolution. This emphasizes the significance of cultivating sturdy skilled relationships with superiors and constantly demonstrating qualities valued by the Navy.
-
Profession Development Implications:
Promotion suggestions affect not solely instant development alternatives but additionally long-term profession development. Constant patterns of sturdy suggestions show sustained efficiency and management potential, making a optimistic trajectory for future development and profession improvement. Conversely, a sample of decrease suggestions can sign areas needing enchancment and may hinder future profession alternatives. This underscores the significance of viewing promotion suggestions not simply as remoted occasions however as integral elements of long-term profession administration. Sailors ought to actively search suggestions from superiors and work diligently to handle any recognized weaknesses to enhance future suggestions and improve profession prospects.
In conclusion, promotion suggestions are integral to Navy development outcomes, offering important qualitative context that enhances quantitative efficiency knowledge. Commanding officer enter, correlation with evaluations, impression on choice boards, and implications for profession development all spotlight the importance of those suggestions in shaping particular person development outcomes. Understanding this interaction empowers sailors to strategy profession improvement strategically, specializing in constant excessive efficiency, cultivating sturdy management qualities, and fostering optimistic skilled relationships to safe favorable suggestions and maximize their potential for development inside the Navy.
9. Official Development Lists
Official Development Lists symbolize the fruits of the U.S. Navy development course of, formally asserting the names of sailors chosen for promotion to the following paygrade. These lists instantly mirror the outcomes of development examinations, efficiency evaluations, awards, time in price, and promotion suggestions, solidifying the outcomes of the aggressive cycle. The lists set up a direct, causal hyperlink between particular person efficiency and development alternative. A sailor’s look on the listing confirms their profitable competitors and marks a major milestone of their naval profession. Conversely, absence from the listing signifies that development has not been achieved within the present cycle. For instance, a sailor showing on the listing for development to Petty Officer First Class has demonstrably met the necessities and outperformed friends competing for restricted quotas. This achievement interprets to elevated duty, larger pay, and profession development.
The significance of Official Development Lists extends past particular person recognition. These lists function official information, documenting profession development inside the Navy. They supply a verifiable supply for figuring out a sailor’s development historical past and {qualifications}, impacting future assignments, coaching alternatives, and management roles. Moreover, the lists contribute to total pressure administration, informing manning ranges and personnel distribution throughout totally different rankings and paygrades. For instance, the variety of developments inside a particular score, mirrored within the official listing, can affect future recruitment and coaching quotas, guaranteeing the Navy maintains the mandatory personnel steadiness to satisfy operational necessities. This sensible utility highlights the broader significance of development lists inside the total construction of the Navy.
In abstract, Official Development Lists will not be merely bulletins however formal confirmations of accomplishment inside the Navy development system. They symbolize the tangible end result of a aggressive course of, instantly impacting particular person careers and influencing broader pressure administration choices. Understanding the importance of those liststheir connection to particular person efficiency, their position as official information, and their affect on pressure managementprovides beneficial context for navigating the complexities of naval development and appreciating its impression on each particular person sailors and the Navy as an entire.
Often Requested Questions Relating to Development
This part addresses frequent inquiries relating to Navy development outcomes, offering readability and steering for navigating the complexities of the promotion system.
Query 1: When are development outcomes sometimes launched?
Launch dates differ relying on the particular development cycle. Info is usually disseminated through official Navy channels, together with Navy Personnel Command web sites and command bulletins.
Query 2: How are development quotas decided?
Quotas mirror personnel wants, budgetary constraints, and the general pressure construction of the Navy. These necessities fluctuate based mostly on operational calls for and strategic planning.
Query 3: What’s the position of the Remaining A number of Rating (FMS)?
The FMS serves as the first rating mechanism for development candidates. It includes varied weighted elements, together with efficiency evaluations, examination scores, awards, and time in price.
Query 4: How can a sailor enhance their possibilities of development?
Constant superior efficiency, devoted examination preparation, and proactive profession planning are essential for maximizing development potential. Looking for mentorship and steering from senior personnel additionally proves helpful.
Query 5: What assets can be found to help sailors with the development course of?
Command profession counselors, academic companies officers, and the Navy Development Middle present beneficial assets, together with research supplies, examination data, and customized steering.
Query 6: What occurs if a sailor is just not chosen for development?
Non-selection doesn’t preclude future development alternatives. Sailors ought to evaluate their efficiency, determine areas for enchancment, and proceed getting ready for subsequent development cycles.
Understanding the dynamics of the development system, together with quotas, FMS calculations, and accessible assets, is essential for navigating the trail towards profession development inside the Navy.
For additional data and particular steering, seek the advice of official Navy assets and command profession counselors. They will present tailor-made assist and handle particular person circumstances successfully.
Ideas for Navigating Navy Development
Strategic planning and constant effort are essential for profitable navigation of the Navy’s aggressive development system. The next ideas present sensible steering for maximizing development potential.
Tip 1: Perceive Development Necessities: Totally evaluate the necessities for particular rankings and paygrades. Seek the advice of official assets just like the Navy Development Guide and command profession counselors for detailed data relating to eligibility standards, examination content material, and efficiency expectations. This foundational information allows efficient planning and preparation.
Tip 2: Prioritize Sustained Superior Efficiency: Constant excessive efficiency in day by day duties varieties the cornerstone of development success. Try for excellence in all assigned duties, demonstrating initiative, management potential, and dedication to the Navy’s core values. Documented superior efficiency instantly impacts evaluations and promotion suggestions.
Tip 3: Dedicate Time to Examination Preparation: Development examinations assess essential information and expertise related to particular rankings. Devoted research, using accessible assets such because the Navy Development Middle and command research teams, considerably improves examination efficiency. Targeted preparation will increase the chance of reaching aggressive scores.
Tip 4: Search Mentorship and Steering: Skilled mentors, together with senior enlisted personnel and command profession counselors, provide beneficial insights and steering for navigating the complexities of the development system. Mentorship offers customized assist and facilitates knowledgeable decision-making.
Tip 5: Observe Time in Price (TIR): Preserve consciousness of TIR necessities for desired paygrades. Ample TIR is a prerequisite for development eligibility. Monitoring TIR allows proactive planning and ensures well timed achievement of this essential requirement.
Tip 6: Perceive the Remaining A number of Rating (FMS): Familiarize oneself with the FMS calculation, together with the weighting of particular person elements. This understanding allows strategic prioritization of efforts to maximise total rating and enhance competitiveness.
Tip 7: Try for Awards and Recognition: Whereas not the only determinant, awards and decorations contribute to a sailor’s total profile and might improve development prospects. Search alternatives to excel and contribute to the mission, doubtlessly incomes recognition that displays dedication and professionalism.
By constantly making use of the following tips, sailors considerably improve their prospects for development, contributing to each particular person profession development and the general power of the naval pressure. These sensible methods empower sailors to navigate the aggressive development panorama successfully and obtain their skilled targets inside the Navy.
The next part concludes this overview of Navy development, summarizing key takeaways and providing remaining suggestions for continued profession improvement.
Conclusion
Naval development outcomes symbolize a fruits of particular person effort, rigorous analysis, and the Navy’s personnel wants. This text explored the multifaceted nature of the development system, analyzing key elements reminiscent of eligibility necessities, the position of examination scores and efficiency evaluations, the impression of time in price and awards, the importance of quotas and the ultimate a number of rating, the burden of promotion suggestions, and the conclusive nature of official development lists. Understanding these interconnected components is essential for profitable navigation of the aggressive development panorama.
Development inside the Navy signifies elevated duty, skilled development, and contribution to a essential nationwide safety mission. Dedication to steady enchancment, proactive engagement with the development system, and a dedication to excellence stay important for reaching particular person profession aspirations and guaranteeing a extremely expert and succesful naval pressure. Constant effort, knowledgeable decision-making, and a deal with skilled improvement pave the trail towards profitable development and contribute to the enduring power of the U.S. Navy.
